My Little Chickadee (1940), directed by Edward F. Cline. What a “euphonious appellation,” my what “symmetrical digits,” “Is this a game of chance?” “Not the way I play it. No.” This film has its moments, but fewer of them than it might have once had. Both Mae West and W. C. Fields are amusing actors, and they play off each other well here, but it is difficult to watch and hear racist goings on that we have in this picture. It would be okay if the action just kept with the western spoof stuff without us having to watch Fields interact with Milton (George Moran), the Native person played by a white person and caricatured unpleasantly. Fields also has a couple of one-liners that opt for the racial slur. What just might save the picture is Mae West’s character, Flower Belle, who controls the situation admirably, although it may be difficult to see her as the siren she is supposed to be. She has three men on the string, one a hapless buffoon, another a thief/saloon owner/murderer, and the third a newspaper editor. Her interest in the saloon owner who moonlights as a masked robber gives us a moral conundrum perhaps better not contemplated. West’s ability at innuendo is nowhere more evident than in the film’s final shot when the words The End appear on the screen. As for Field’s Cuthbert J. Twillie he does his thing, even bedding down with a goat at one point. “Beelzebub! I’ve been hoodwinked.” All in all, this is a film for the archives.
Western Union (1941), directed by Fritz Lang. This is the second of Lang’s three westerns, and perhaps the weakest of the three. It does have splendid locations shots, but at times it seems to want to be a comedy and at other times a tragedy and then a Civil War drama and then again a historical epic depicting the building of the telegraph from Omaha to Salt Lake City. It also offers an unfortunate depiction of Native Americans. There are, however, Langian elements here. We have Lang’s interest in communications (the telegraph) and in the capital necessary for the building of an infrastructure. We have a company of men working together to build a nation. We also have Lang’s tormented hero, on the run, but fated to run right smack into that from which he is running. The relationship between Vance Shaw (Randolph Scott) and Edward Creighton (Dean Jagger) has an intensity we often see between men in Lang’s films. The doomed relationship between Shaw and Sue Creighton (Virginia Gilmore) is also Langian. All in all, this is a mixed pleasure.
Home in Oklahoma (1946), directed by William Witney. B western starring Roy Rogers, Trigger, Dale Evans, and ‘Gabby’ Hayes. Roy and Dale are rival newspaper reporters, he from the country and she from the city, out to solve the murder of Sam Talbot, a wealthy rancher. Talbot leaves his ranch not to his only surviving relative, niece Jan Holloway (Carol Hughes), but to the 12-year-old boy, Duke Lowery (Lanny Rees). Being passed over for the young boy does not sit well with Ms Holloway. We have much riding about, quite a bit of singing, some detective work, some humour from Gabby, a vicious fist fight, a few flying bullets, and the discovery that Jan and her partner/friend Steve McClory (George Meeker) are the villains and murderers. There is nothing out of the ordinary here for a Roy Rogers film and B western, but the performances are sprightly and Witney’s direction is crisp. Roy and Dale as newspaper people give us something akin, albeit without the sophistication, to Tracy and Hepburn as lawyers in Adam’s Rib.
Canyon Passage (1946), directed by Jacques Tourneur. Tourneur is a director I admire for his lush colour films and his moody black and white films. His films ooze atmosphere. Canyon Passage, Tourneur’s first colour film and his first western, delivers much atmosphere, much colour, and much more. The much more includes a cast of characters who prove to be deftly human. As one reviewer noted, there are no white hats/black hats here. With the exception of Ward Bond’s villain, Honey Bragg, these people are a mixture of good and bad. This is nowhere more evident than in the friendship between Logan (Dana Andrews) and George (Brian Donlevy). The location shooting in Oregon is masterful and the on-location sets for the various places are meticulous. One of these places, Jacksonville, looks as if it was hewed out of the wilderness without much planning. Interiors and exteriors are impressive. The film examines the frontier in 1856 and the tensions it raises between communal activity and individual aspirations. Along for the ride is Hi Linnet (Hoagy Carmichael) who strums a mandolin and sings a few songs, including “Ole Buttermilk Sky.” This is a western with a fairly familiar plot, but with depth. Did I say fairly familiar plot? Well, the plot is not straight forward; it has threads that have to do with survival in the wilderness, conflict with native peoples, human failings, frontier justice, the love of nature, relationships between men and women. Several women appear in important roles; the two most prominent are Lucy (Susan Hayward) and Caroline (Patricia Roc). All in all, this is a special western.
Go West (1940), directed by Edward Buzzell. The Marx brother (3 of them) go west in this spoof of westerns. A late entry into the brothers’ filmography, Go West is better than I remember it from a long ago viewing. We first see the brothers out west in a scene with Monument Valley as a backdrop, and then we see them inside a stagecoach in a scene that reminds me of both Ford’s famous film and the stateroom scene from Night at the Opera. The final chase scene with horse and buggy racing a locomotive might remind us of Keaton’s The General. Scenes in the saloon might remind us of Destry Rides Again. You get the idea, this is a film that plays loosely with western tropes. The obligatory scenes of Chico at the piano and Harpo at the – well harp, are as good, if not better, than similar scenes in the earlier films. Both are clever and inventive. Groucho manages some acerbic one-liners, and Harpo does his business with scissors and honker and facial expressions. Even the scenes in the Indian village are less offensive than they might have been. The brothers’ films for MGM are generally dismissed as inferior than the ones they made with Paramount, but Go West has its moments and manages to be fun.
Duel in the Sun (1946), directed by King Vidor (with uncredited help from some six others, including Joseph von Sternberg!). This is David O. Selznik’s infamous production of a film that was derided in the press as “Lust in the Dust.” Selznik wanted to replicate his success with Gone with the Wind, and also to make Jennifer Jones a star. The result is this over-heated western that has few typically “western” moments but much obsession. Right from the get-go, with the prologue that has Herbert Marshall shoot his Native American wife for her infidelity and say goodbye to his biracial daughter, Pearl (Jones), we have characters who obsess over one thing and another, mostly sex. This is a film with high ambition, even beginning with a nine-minute Prelude, followed by a three-minute Overture, before the credits role. The cast is a who’s who of heavyweights: Lillian Gish, Lionel Barrymore, Charles Bickford, Walter Houston, Harry Carey, Joseph Cotton, Otto Kruger, Butterfly McQueen, and Gregory Peck. Peck has the role of Lewt (I kept hearing ‘Lewd’) McCanles, the amoral son of the patriarch, Senator Jackson McCanles (Barrymore). If you have seen the film, imagine John Wayne in the role of this dissolute son who leers and sneers and generally behaves in a disgusting manner; Wayne was the first actor signed to play Lewt, but Selznik thought he did not have enough sex appeal. Anyway, we have a sprawling western that tries to deliver spectacle and deep emotion. It tries too hard and gives us unpleasant characters and an unsavoury presentation of racial stereotyping. Oh, the film does have some striking cinematography courtesy of Lee Garmes, Ray Rennahan, and Hal Rosson. The confrontation between the McCanles ranch hands and the railroad-building crew is as spectacular as it gets in westerns, with hundreds of horses and men riding and riding across the wind-swept landscape. Then we have the ending, an ending that must be one of the most, if not the most, risible in cinema history. I confess I am a sucker for this ending.